Innovating Arabic Language Module Design in Higher Education through a Content-Driven Integrated Model

Authors

  • Meliza Budiarti Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Author
  • Mohammad Taufiq Abdul Ghani Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/ijplc.v3i1.36

Keywords:

E- module, Content and Language Integrated Learning, ADDIE model, Arabic Rhetoric

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of an e-module developed for the Ilm al-Bayan course at UIN Imam Bonjol Padang through a series of systematic empirical evaluations involving experimental and control groups. The development of the e-module was guided by the ADDIE instructional design model, encompassing five structured stages: needs analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Prior to hypothesis testing, data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests, while data homogeneity was examined using Levene’s test. Inferential statistical analyses included Paired Samples t-Tests to evaluate within-group learning improvements and Independent Samples t-Tests to compare post-test performance between groups. The results indicated that the data from both the experimental and control groups were normally distributed and homogeneous, fulfilling the assumptions required for parametric testing. The Paired Samples t-Test revealed statistically significant improvements in learning outcomes for both groups; however, the experimental group demonstrated a higher mean difference (–7.036, p < 0.05) compared to the control group (–4.673, p < 0.05). The study underscores the potential of e-modules as effective, student-centered pedagogical tools that support interactive learning and contribute to the digital transformation of Arabic language education in higher education.

References

Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Arabic rhetoric: A pragmatic analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965399

Alakrash, H. (2020). The effectiveness of employing Telegram application in teaching vocabulary: A quasi-experimental study. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3650403

Aro, S., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2015). School-external factors in Finnish content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programs. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.894937

Azmi, A., Al-Jouie, M., & Hussain, M. (2019). AAEE: Automated evaluation of students’ essays in Arabic language. Information Processing & Management, 56(6), 102063. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457319304935

Banegas, D. (2011). Review of CLIL: Content and language integrated learning by D. Coyle, P. Hood, & D. Marsh. Language Learning Journal, 39(1), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2010.539045

Banegas, D., & Beamud, M. del P. (2022). Content and language integrated learning: A duoethnographic study about CLIL pre-service teacher education in Argentina and Spain. RELC Journal, 53(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220930442

Banseng, S., Sandai, R., & Rasool, S. (2021). Language of strata and expression in construction of sampi amongst iban community in malaysia. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 4(3), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5169017

Barre-Parrales, P., & Villafuerte-Holguín, J. (2021). English as a foreign language instruction in Ecuador: Implementation of content and language integrated learning during 2019–2021. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 51–63. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311546

Calafato, R. (2020). Learning Arabic in Scandinavia: Motivation, metacognition, and autonomy. Lingua, 246, 102943. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384120301510

Coyle, D. (2006). Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Scottish Languages Review, 13, 1–18. https://www.academia.edu/download/33938622/slrcoyle_CLIL_motivating_teachers_and_learners.pdf

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

Deswila, N., Kustati, M., Besral, B., & Sukandi, S. (2020). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach across curriculum in science classrooms. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 1–10. http://jiecr.org/index.php/jiecr/article/view/4

Elaish, M. M., Ghani, N. A., Shuib, L., & Al-Haiqi, A. (2019). Development of a mobile game application to boost students’ motivation in learning English vocabulary. IEEE Access, 7, 13326–13337. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891504

Ghani, M. T. A., & Daud, W. A. A. W. (2018). Adaptation of ADDIE instructional model in developing educational website for language learning. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 8(2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

Ghani, M. T. A., Hamzah, M., Ramli, S., & Ab Wahab, W. A. (2019). A questionnaire-based approach on technology acceptance model for mobile digital game-based learning. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 5(14), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.894937

Gillani, B. (2013). Cognitive theory and the design of education-to-work connection. Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501907.2501938

Hakim, R., Ritonga, M., & Susanti, W. (2020). Implementation of contextual teaching and learning in Islamic education at Madrasah Diniyah. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3732848

Harrop, E. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Limitations and possibilities. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539731

Kontio, J., & Sylvén, L. K. (2015). Language alternation and language norm in vocational content and language integrated learning. Language Learning Journal, 45(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1053279

Lasagabaster, D. (2019). Motivation in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) research. In A. Al-Hoorie (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 425–441). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_17

Marsh, D., & Martín, M. F. (2012). Content and language integrated learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0190

Nazeri, M. (2022). Penafsiran Wahbah Az-Zuhaili terhadap ayat-ayat tasybīh dalam Surah Al-A‘raf (Kajian ilmu balaghah) [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau]. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/63752/

Nengsih, Y. K. & Handrianto, C. (2022). Andragogi: Seni membelajarkan orang dewasa. Bening Media Publishing.

Nengsih, Y. K., Pernantah, P. S., Kenedi, A. K., & Tannoubi, A. (2022). The implementation of interactive learning strategy to formulating learning objectives in package c program. Spektrum: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (PLS), 10(2), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.24036/spektrumpls.v10i2.117215

Nikula, T., & Marsh, D. (1998). Terminological considerations regarding content and language integrated learning. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 67, 1–14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED422727

Nuha, M., & Musyafa’ah, N. (2023). Application of the contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model in improving the quality of balaghah learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v17i1.2445

Pancheva, T., & Antov, P. (2017). Application of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in engineering education. Management and Sustainable Development, 63(2), 129–136.

Ramadhani, D., Kenedi, A. K., & Rafli, M. F. (2022). Advancement of STEM-based digital module to enhance HOTS of prospective elementary school teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(2), 981-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202245

Shabriyah, N., & Nuruddien, M. (2022). Kontribusi ilmu balaghah terhadap makna dan sastra dalam ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an. El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 10(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.35888/el-wasathiya.v10i01.4830

Sidik, F. (2020). Actualization of Jean Piaget’s cognitive development theory in learning. Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 4(6), 1211–1218. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i6.8055

Syukron, A. (2023). Dimensi sastra dalam QS. Al-Furqan: Analisis tasybīh dan isti‘ārah [Undergraduate thesis, IIQ Jakarta]. http://repository.iiq.ac.id/handle/123456789/3385

Tannoubi, A., Quansah, F., Magouri, I., Chalghaf, N., Bonsaksen, T., Srem-Sai, M., Hagan, J. E., Azaiez, F., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2023). Modelling the associations between academic engagement, study process and grit on academic achievement of physical education and sport university students. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01454-2

Wardani, H. K. (2022). Pemikiran teori kognitif Piaget di sekolah dasar. Khazanah Pendidikan, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v16i1.12251

Waty, E. R. K., Nengsih, Y. K., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). The quality of teacher-made summative tests for Islamic education subject teachers in Palembang Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 43(1), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.53558

Zakaria, G., Abdul, A., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). The art of majaz in the Malay language: An analysis based on Arabic rhetoric. Pendeta, 11(1), 1–12. http://ojs.upsi.edu.my/index.php/PENDETA/article/view/3618

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Innovating Arabic Language Module Design in Higher Education through a Content-Driven Integrated Model. (2026). International Journal of Pedagogy and Learning Community (IJPLC), 3(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijplc.v3i1.36